《難以置信的事實》講述什么樣的故事?
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
1、《難以置信的事實》是在哪一年上映的?
《難以置信的事實》是霍爾·哈特利于1989年拍攝上映的一部經典喜劇片。此片開創了美國當代喜劇片的先河,《難以置信的事實》上映時票房穩坐國內外前三,創下當年最佳紀錄。在當時安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特均為最佳演員,安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特以精彩演技和完美的形象,奠定在美國影視地位。安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特飾演角色多年后仍為大眾爭相模仿。霍爾·哈特利之前曾被人懷疑其能力,而《難以置信的事實》卻奠定霍爾·哈特利喜劇片風格。《難以置信的事實》首映時曾獲海外喜劇片和媒體廣泛好評,被認為其優秀程度,是足以與同時期(指1980年代)好萊塢(好萊塢)優秀喜劇片齊名。
2、被稱為喜劇片的開先河之作的《難以置信的事實》,是霍爾·哈特利最好的作品嗎?
從霍爾·哈特利斬獲喜劇片最佳導演 我就覺得這部《難以置信的事實》是他最好的喜劇片。雖然霍爾·哈特利后來還拍出來了評價特別好的喜劇片,但是《難以置信的事實》是他喜劇片的代表作品。
3、《難以置信的事實》為什么能成為經典之作?
提起美國喜劇片,人們就肯定會說出《難以置信的事實》的名字。這部由霍爾·哈特利導演,安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特主演的《難以置信的事實》,在當時,真的是成為了一匹黑馬,殺出了一條血路,創造了一個奇跡。為何會這么說,我想,就連霍爾·哈特利導演和安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特,都沒想到這部喜劇片會得到這樣好的反響。霍爾·哈特利先生曾說過,這是一群失意的人湊到了一起創作出來的一部作品。因為在《難以置信的事實》開拍之前,安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特已經有4年無戲可拍,而安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特主演的喜劇片,票房始終不理想,這樣的幾個人湊在了一起,也真是緣分!所以,正是這樣的失意感和強烈的自尊心,他們在喜劇片中投入的熱情,是我們難以想象的,其實《難以置信的事實》中的人物心理歷程和感人的劇情,何嘗不是現實中他們的真實寫照呢?所以,他們懷著一腔心有不甘的英雄氣,用他們的實力和人情成就了這部經典喜劇片,也成就了他們自己!
4、如何評價《難以置信的事實》?
《難以置信的事實》口碑非常好深受廣大觀眾喜愛,《難以置信的事實》一經播放立刻引來無數人關注,不僅安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特演的好而且該喜劇片故事情節也非常緊湊,神馬影院(www.lyijob.com)觀看起來特別流暢同時還能扣人心弦,即使目前《難以置信的事實》收視率不佳但是該片目前受歡迎程度已經蒸蒸日上。該喜劇片主演安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特,她在該喜劇片中的演技可圈可點,受到安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特演的好而且該喜劇片迷的認可。
5、《難以置信的事實》喜劇片的主要內容
《難以置信的事實》是一部喜劇片喜劇片,由導演:霍爾·哈特利執導,主演:安德林妮·夏莉,羅伯特·約翰·伯克,馬特·馬洛伊,凱莉·萊卡特,
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
6、《難以置信的事實》是霍爾·哈特利導演的一部經典的喜劇美國片大全,該劇講述了:Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal,想看更多的相關影視作品,請收藏我們的網站:www.lyijob.com
Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career. Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.) As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisonerpenitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone (I'm a mechanic), yet the symbolism is rich he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played. The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . You need a woman not a girl) is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly arty and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual am notare too argument). Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the unbelievable truth of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.